Mysterious
Press, 1971
‘It
is more that fifteen years since Colin Watson’s Snobbery with Violence first appeared, a pioneer study using crime
fiction, that most popular form of reading, to, in the author’s own words in
his chapter on the thirties vogue for oriental villains ‘tell something about
the way…people thought, what they feared and what they despised.’ There have
been academic studies of popular fiction in much of this field since, chiefly
American in origin, but none I think seriously supersedes this book and
certainly none can be read with anything like as much ease and
pleasure.’(Preface by H.R.F. Keating, 1986)’
‘that School of Snobbery
with Violence that runs like a thread of good-class tweed through
twentieth-century literature.’- Alan Bennett
Charging
commercial institutions with failure to educate public taste is an indulgence
from which intellectuals will only be deterred when they grasp that a
non-existent contract can neither be breeched or enforced. If commerce is to be
indicted for anything, it can only be for commercialism, and whether that is a
crime or not is a political question. Very few people who walked into the High
Street from a library forty yeas ago with three or four thrillers and romances
under their arm had the slightest misgivings about the freedom of choice they
had just exercised. Even fewer would have been prepared for a moment to credit
that the ‘good read to which they were looking forward was part of a process
that debilitated taste, shrank discrimination and impoverished thought.
Despite
the economic crisis, chronic unemployment and widespread misery in industrial
areas, the mood of the people not immediately affected by these things was
predominantly one of satisfaction. Gilt-edged Victorian and Edwardian optimism
had taken a far less severe a knock from the murderous futility of the 1914-18
war than one might suppose. The middle class had suffered its share of
casualties, of course, but it mourned them as it would have mourned bereavement
by pneumonia or motor accident. Anger was hardly felt at all, and if there was
little of the kind of pride which a nation-wide clutter of memorial masonry made
pretence of witnessing, the ‘sacrifice’ by so many fathers and sons and brothers
and uncles was accepted by most as having been a dutiful and responsible act.
The Great Bore was over, the threat from foreigners had been remove for the
moment, and the prospect visible from city suburb, commuters’ village and
provincial township was one of secure continuance of the old order and its
gradual enrichment by the innovations of progress.
Thus
it was quite possible to be leading a comfortable existence in a pleasant residential
area of Gloucester or Hereford and be genuinely unaware that less than fifty
miles away in the Welsh valleys whole communities were living on a bare
survival level. Kindly Londoners who would have been shocked by the spectacle
of a child shivering with cold simply refused to believe stores of schools on Tyneside
in which, summer and winter, nearly half the pupils sat barefoot in class. The
stories were true, as were those of Durham shipyard towns where only one man in
three had a job, and areas in Lancashire and Cumberland were malnutrition had hoisted
the tuberculosis rate to between ten and twenty times that of the Home
Counties. But distance – even a short distance – was a great insulator of
conscience. So was the notion, inherited from the Victorian self-help school,
that misfortune was somehow the consequence of fecklessness and therefore the
unalterable lot of those who had allowed themselves to slip to the bottom of
the pile. Yet another aid to the equanimity of the comfortably placed was the
preoccupation of the Press with cheerful and trivial themes. With very few
exceptions indeed newspapers were dedicated to the profitable Northcliffe
slogan ‘give the public what it wants.’
What
the public – the middle class, reading public – clearly did not want was
disquieting dispatches from beyond the frontiers of its own experience.
Circulation managers noted that too frequent reference to menacing political
situations abroad depressed sales, as did ‘sordid’ stories of industrial
depression at home. News selection and treatment were adjusted accordingly. The
News Chronicle (formerly Dicken’s Daily News) was practically alone among
national daily newspapers in consistently presenting foreign and home events
with due regard to the realities of the situation. The readers of the rest were
shown an Italy and Germany whose rulers, while not quite gentlemen, perhaps,
were too busy building autobahns and getting trains to run on time for the
entertainment of any aggressive intentions; a Russia of measureless malignance
and cardboard tanks; a France consisting of the Promenade des Anglais, rude
night clubs and the Maginot Line; and a motherland to which prosperity was
slowly and surely returning while Mr. Baldwin tamped his pipe, Mr. MacDonald
mixed his metaphors, and Gracie Fields led a crowd of happy, be-shawled mill
girls in a chorus of ‘Sing As We Go.’
The
euphoric conspiracy was not completely solid. Apart from the predictable
fusillade from left-wing polemicists, there came protests from relatively
respectable quarters. Wells warned and Shaw taunted. George Orwell’s dark prophesies
frightened a few people. Hilaire Belloc declared England to be ‘done’ before he
lapsed into since in order to contemplate the enormity of the demolition of
Hanacker Mill. The intellectual poet, Auden and Isherwood, blistered the smug
compatriots whose salvation they were to leave others to complete when the
opted for America in 1939. A particularly unkind cut, coming as it did from the
author of The Good Companions, 1929’s top favorite among solid
citizens, was delivered by J.B Priestly in 1934. His English Journey confirmed by personal testimony that there exited
on a large scale places and conditions of unimaginable awfulness. Some library
committees in the areas he described, persuaded that Mr. Priestly had been less
than fair, declined to stock the book.
Outside
the rotting industrial areas, developments favorable to the expansion of a
‘leisure’ literature continued steadily during the 1920s and 1930s…by the end
of this period crime, adventure and romance fiction accounted for three-quarters
of all novels published in the English language…..
No comments:
Post a Comment